copyright

6 June 2012 at 11:03am
I was struck by a recent suggestion from the Minister for Culture, Media and Sport that there could be “a cross-industry body, perhaps modelled on the Internet Watch Foundation [IWF], to be charged with identifying infringing websites against which action could be taken”.
6 June 2012 at 11:01am
The Article 29 Working Party of European Data Protection regulators have now given a bit more information about their preferred approach to gaining consent for third party cookies in a letter commenting on the (unsatisfactory, they feel) approach proposed by the Internet Advertising Bureau Europe.
6 June 2012 at 11:01am
As well as deciding not to implement the web blocking powers under the Digital Economy Act 2010, the Government has today provided a progress update on the rest of the Act.
6 June 2012 at 10:57am
That seems to be the rather depressing message from the European Court of Justice to websites that allow third parties to post content (e.g. the comments on this blog). Article 14 of the European eCommerce Directive says that those hosts are protected from liability for the content until they are aware of specific infringements of the law. Once aware, they must act expeditiously to deal with the problem.
29 April 2013 at 1:05pm
The Chief Executive of OFCOM, Ed Richards, gave evidence to the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee last week, in which he reported on progress on the copyright enforcement and web blocking parts of the Digital Economy Act 2010.
13 August 2012 at 11:08am
I'm pleased to report that the Internet Society has published a discussion paper looking at different methods being proposed around the world to respond to the use of the Internet to breach Intellectual Property Rights. For each of the approaches - graduated response and suspension of access,  traffic shaping, blocking, content identification and filtering, and DNS manipulation - the paper looks at the implications for the Internet, Internet technologies, access and use.
6 June 2012 at 10:45am
The Advocate General to the European Court has published his recommendation for the Court's response to questions raised in the long-running Belgian case of SABAM v Scarlet. In 2007 the Belgian court ordered the ISP Scarlet, at the request of the copyright enforcement society SABAM, to implement specific Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) systems to detect and prevent its users from exchanging copyrighted material on peer-to-peer networks.
6 June 2012 at 10:44am
It seems hard to believe, but Tuesday 12th April 2011 was the first anniversary of the passing of the Digital Economy Act 2010.
29 April 2013 at 1:07pm
Nominet have published an interesting analysis of the legal issues around any possible process for suspending domains associated with criminal activity. This raises the rather worrying issue that the legal position is not clear if a registry is informed of unlawful conduct somewhere in their domain and decides that the evidence is not strong enough to justify them acting.
29 April 2013 at 1:08pm
I had a meeting with Ofcom this morning as part of their review of section 17 of the Digital Economy Act 2010. That section, if enabled by the Secretary of State, would allow courts to order a service provider “to prevent its service being used to gain access to [an Internet] location”.
Subscribe to copyright