Last updated: 
3 months 3 weeks ago
Blog Manager
One of Jisc’s activities is to monitor and, where possible, influence regulatory developments that affect us and our customer universities, colleges and schools as operators of large computer networks. Since Janet and its customer networks are classified by Ofcom as private networks, postings here are likely to concentrate on the regulation of those networks. Postings here are, to the best of our knowledge, accurate on the date they are made, but may well become out of date or unreliable at unpredictable times thereafter. Before taking action that may have legal consequences, you should talk to your own lawyers. NEW: To help navigate the many posts on the General Data Protection Regulation, I've classified them as most relevant to developing a GDPR compliance process, GDPR's effect on specific topics, or how the GDPR is being developed. Or you can just use my free GDPR project plan.

Group administrators:

DEB - Unintended Consequences

Wednesday, June 6, 2012 - 09:52

As mentioned in my last posting on the Digital Economy Bill, the root cause of its problems for universities, colleges, schools, businesses and rightsholders is the very wide definition of "subscriber" that the Bill uses to assign roles in dealing with copyright breach. In effect, any individual or organisation that isn't itself an ISP could be caught within the definition of subscriber.

I've now managed to track down the Government's formal Impact Assessment for the Bill, and discovered that the only business sectors that this mentions are "Internet Service Providers and Mobile Network Operators", "creative content industries (right holders)" and "the publishing industry". "Consumers" are mentioned as customers of ISPs and possible infringers of copyright. There's no mention of business or other organisational customers of ISPs. Replacing the word "consumer" in the Impact Assessment by "subscriber" in the Bill looks harmless but may have accidentally increased the scope of the definition and damaged the effectiveness of the Bill. As we are often reminded, in legal matters the small print can be really important :-(