Library items tagged: Videoconferencing

Anonymous
Video started life as an analogue signal and remained so for over 50 years. However, digital television via satellite, cable and terrestrial transmission is now rapidly replacing analogue. Digital signals are less expensive to transmit because more information can be carried within a given bandwidth using digital multiplex and compression techniques.
Anonymous
H. Benoit Arnold, Digital Television. ISBN 0340691905 | 0471238104 GQOS: http://www.isi.edu/div7/rsvp/overview.html H.264: http://www.wipro.com/insights/mpeg4videocoding.htm IEC : http://www.iec.ch/ IETF : http://www.ietf.org/
Anonymous
The increased popularity of IP (H.323) based services due mainly to the lower cost of connection has spawned a great deal of development to produce effective methods of delivering high quality videoconference (and telephone traffic) over the IP infrastructure. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has been particularly active in defining standards in this area while the major network equipment manufacturers have produced workable network solutions.
Anonymous
The ISO and IEC standards bodies have formed two committees that have defined video/audio compression, namely the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) and the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG). These two committees have defined the JPEG, MPEG1, MPEG2 and MPEG4 standards. While these standards are more applicable to broadcasting and multimedia, some of the standards are used in videoconferencing.
Anonymous
The main standard in use for data sharing within videoconferencing is T.120 Equipment that is T.120 compliant interleaves the data sharing information within the pass band of the H.320, H.323 etc. conferencing channel. This is an asset as sound, vision and data are shared across a single channel, but it can also be a hindrance as with low bandwidth channels, e.g. ISDN2, the T.120 data exchange part can degrade the audio and video signals to an unacceptable degree. For further information, see the VTAS guide, Data Sharing within Videoconferencing.
Anonymous
The sub-standards most likely to be met with in practice are detailed below: 1. Video Coding Standards H.261 Video CODEC For audio visual services; this defines the way in which the picture information is compressed and coded to enable transmission over low bandwidth networks. It is the baseline coding which is mandatory for most videoconferencing systems to ensure interoperability at a basic level. H.261 Annex D Graphics
Anonymous
Manufacturers may also choose to include proprietary enhancements, e.g. Polycom’s Siren Audio extends the audio bandwidth up to 14kHz to improve the sound quality. These proprietary enhancements are not international standards so only provide a benefit when used between products from the same manufacturer. Proprietary standards should not be confused with ‘options’ within the ITUT standards. The options are not mandatory but when incorporated will allow improved compatible communication between dissimilar equipment without problems.
Anonymous
Other, optional, sub-standards are defined to allow enhanced performance, e.g. H.243 provides for multipoint control function, i.e. when two or more sites conference there is provision for sending signals through a Multipoint Control Unit (MCU). H.281 provides for far-end camera control from the local site, H.282/H.283 provide the requirements for remote control of devices other than the camera, and T.120 provides for data exchange.
Anonymous
Within each ITUT umbrella standard, minimum mandatory standards are defined that will guarantee compatibility, albeit at a basic level, e.g. within H.320 provision must be made for H.261 video coding, G.711 audio coding and H.221, H.230, H.242 communications protocols. Similarly for H.323, the corresponding mandatory standards are H.261, G.711 and H.225/H.245 communication protocols. These mandatory requirements will allow all compliant products to communicate easily and effectively.