Group administrators:
Recent members:
eduroam in Public Buildings and Spaces in City Centres
Not Final
The expansion of the eduroam Wi-Fi service footprint in city centre areas both in public buildings and in public spaces is one of the major objectives of eduroam(UK). Within the current service delivery model for eduroam in the UK this however can only really be achieved with the active support and collaboration of the local government authority. With the government's Superconnected Cities programme now resulting in live public Wi-Fi services in downtown areas, public funding is enabling the dream to become a reality in many cities. To enable eduroam which of course benefits only a subset of the public, to be provided over the new infrastructure, only a small additional financial outlay is required. But to drive the initiative to successful conclusion the key element in many cases will be the involvement of the local university.
In many Superconnected Cities programmes, local authorities have been awarded DFCMS funding to provide free/low cost public Wi-Fi rather than a 'special Wi-Fi' service for education. Nevertheless eduroam, which benefits a significant proportion of the city's population, can be provided in parallel with free public Wi-Fi at very little cost. And with local university collaboration this cost can be kept to an absolute minimum, not least because the univerity will have the eduroam expertise necessary. The university may even be able to provide the RADIUS coupling/peering for the Wi-Fi contractor’s wireless service AP controllers, although of course this depends on local circumstances.
There are a number of issues that need to be decided and agreement reached on (which are not dissimilar to the issues presented to the provision of eduroam in NHS hospitals):
Who will be funding the Wi-Fi infrastructure?
Who will be responsible for delivering and supporting the infrastructure?
How will power to the APs be provided (and who will be picking up the electricity bill)
How will RADIUS for the eduroam service be provided, who will pay for the kit, who will set them up and who will be responsible for operating the servers?
Internet backhaul
Two important issues to be considered are the connection to the Internet and the IP address space:
Regarding bandwidth, it can be argued that without an eduroam city service, students and researchers would use the city Wi-Fi bandwidth, so the same users connecting to an eduroam city service instead would use similar bandwidth but on the eduroam VLAN. Therefore there is a good case for the eduroam internet feed to go through the city connection. (Normal eduroam Tech Spec constraints apply to this of course). If the local authority is not happy with this, the only alternative is for the traffic to go via the university partner. In these circumstances if local factors dictate that the university is unable to carry the eduroam network traffic this may be a show stopper.
IP space may also be a problematic issue for some universities. If IPv4 space is limited, network address translation is permissible on eduroam network services, but this adds complications and issues may arise at the gateway. Provision of eduroam in public spaces makes for a perfectly justifiable case for the allocation of a larger IP space and this will be supported by eduroam(UK). Alternatively IPv6 addresses may be employed.
RADIUS server provision needs to be decided. As with eduroam in the NHS (although without the complication of the N3 network thankfully) there are two options:
i) The local authority (or it's WISP associate, acting under contract or providing the service as a public sector benefit/differentiating USP) partners with the local university such that the university provides the RADIUS service which then forwards authentication traffic to the eduroam(UK) national RADIUS proxy servers (NRPSs). In this scenario the LA is not required to join eduroam(UK) and the city eduroam service is effectively an extension of the university eduroam service with data traffic from the eduroam VLAN either being directed through the city Internet feed or passed through the university.
ii) The local authority (or it's WISP associate, acting under contract or providing the service as a public sector benefit/differentiating USP) participates directly in eduroam(UK) as a full member and operates its own RADIUS server(s) which handle authentication traffic. These are peered with the eduroam(UK) national RADIUS proxy servers (NRPSs)'s to forward onwards for user authentication. If a WISP is contracted by to provide a Visited Service in a particular town/city where there is only one local university, we would seek to apply the conditions attaching to 'managed (accommodation) service providers' detailed in the Technical Specification. Although the contractual relationship would be with the local authority (although it could be with the local university) the recommendation is for the service provider to form a RADIUS peering relationship with the local university. The aim of this is to reduce essentailly local authentication.
The scenario (ii) option has the advantage that eligible members of the authority's own staff can make use of eduroam. NB There is nothing to exclude the local university from acting as the issuer of the contract with the WISP. (This may need the agreement of the street furniture/infrastructure of the local authority is utilised).
City | Superconnected? | Wi-Fi/WISP | Public Wi-Fi SSID | Buildings, Streets or both | Free or charged for | Local uni-LA partnership | Public internet backhaul | SSID Public & eduroam? | RADIUS provider | eduroam internet backhaul |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aberdeen | Yes | Pinacl Solutions | Aberdeen-city-connect | Both | Free | Yes | ? | Yes | ||
Aberystwyth (1) | No - town council | n/a | ? | n/a | No | eduroam | Ab town council | ? | ||
St Andrews | No | BT WiFi | BTWiFi | Both | Charged | Yes | BT WiFi | St Andrews | St Andrews - Janet | |
Belfast | Yes | BT WiFi | BefastWiFi | Buildings | Free | No | BT WiFi | No eduroam | ||
Birmingham | Yes | |||||||||
Bristol | Yes | |||||||||
Brighton and Hove | Yes | |||||||||
Cambridge | Yes but not funding Wi-Fi | Cambridge Uni | _TheCloud | Streets | Free | Co-operating | The Cloud via Janet | Yes | Cambridge Uni | Cambridge Uni - Janet |
Cardiff | Yes | |||||||||
Coventry | Yes | |||||||||
Derby | Yes | |||||||||
Derry/Londonderry | Yes | |||||||||
Edinburgh | Yes | |||||||||
Glasgow | No | BT Wifi | GlasgowCC WiFi | Both | Free | No | BT WiFi | No eduroam | n/a Captive portal | n/a |
Hull | No | KCOM | ? |
Not yet |
||||||
Leeds and Bradford | Yes | aql | Not yet | |||||||
London | Yes | |||||||||
London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | No | Khipu | ? | Buildings | ? | No | ? | Coming soon | ||
Manchester | Yes | Arquiva | _freebee / _busybee | Both | 30 mins free | - | Arquiva | No | n/a Captive portal | n/a |
Newcastle | Yes | |||||||||
Newport | Yes | |||||||||
Oxford | Yes | BTWiFi | Oxford Free Wi-Fi | Buildings | Free | - | BTWiFi | No | n/a Captive portal | n/a |
Perth | Yes | |||||||||
Portsmouth | Yes | Khipu | My City WiFi | Buildings | Yes | Yes | Portsmouth Uni | Portsmouth Uni - Janet | ||
Salford | Yes | |||||||||
York | Yes | Pinnacl Solutions | CityWiFi | Both? | Free | Yes | Pinnacl | Yes | York Uni | York Uni - Janet |
(1) Aberystwyth Town Council was the first local authority in the UK to become a full member of eduroam(UK). Their eduroam service is at present limited to public buildings although there is the possibility of future provision in public spaces.
Comments
Interestingly enough we have been working with Aberdeen City and have deployed Eduroam in several city locations:
http://www.aberdeencity.gov.uk/council_government/shaping_aberdeen/Wi-Fi...
The majority of the funding came from the "Accelerate Aberdeen Super Connected Cities program", with the contract looking after the physical infrastructure in Council areas.
We piggy back on this infrastructure, providing backhaul, radius and IP addresses for the Eduroam users in an Identical model to the way we work with NHSGrampian.