Last updated: 
1 week 2 days ago
Blog Manager
One of Jisc’s activities is to monitor and, where possible, influence regulatory developments that affect us and our customer universities, colleges and schools as operators of large computer networks. Since Janet and its customer networks are classified by Ofcom as private networks, postings here are likely to concentrate on the regulation of those networks. Postings here are, to the best of our knowledge, accurate on the date they are made, but may well become out of date or unreliable at unpredictable times thereafter. Before taking action that may have legal consequences, you should talk to your own lawyers. NEW: To help navigate the many posts on the General Data Protection Regulation, I've classified them as most relevant to developing a GDPR compliance process, GDPR's effect on specific topics, or how the GDPR is being developed. Or you can just use my free GDPR project plan.

Group administrators:

EU proposes to reduce intermediary protection – but how much?

Wednesday, December 7, 2016 - 10:47

The European Commission recently published wide proposals to reform copyright law. One particular concern is that the proposals appear to reduce the existing legal protections for sites that host third party content. Under the current e-Commerce Directive, such sites are generally protected from liability until they are informed of allegedly infringing content (Article 14), and cannot be required to inspect content before it is published (Article 15).

Recital 38 to the proposed Copyright Directive suggests that some hosting sites will lose one or both of those protections. And it's very unclear, from the draft wording, which sites will be affected. Those that "play an active role … irrespective of the means used therefor" seem to lose their liability protection, those that "store and provide access to the public … thereby going beyond the mere provision of physical facilities" or "stor[e] and provid[e] access to the public to large amounts … of subject-matter uploaded by their users" will be required to take proactive measures.

In our submission to the Intellectual Property Office, we've pointed out that whatever the intended scope of the restrictions is, such uncertain terms are likely to give a much wider range of hosting providers concerns about their legal position. Since organisations typically avoid legal uncertainty, it's likely that unclear wording will result in the withdrawal or restriction of services that the law was supposed to continue to protect.