Last updated: 
3 months 3 weeks ago
Blog Manager
One of Jisc’s activities is to monitor and, where possible, influence regulatory developments that affect us and our customer universities, colleges and schools as operators of large computer networks. Since Janet and its customer networks are classified by Ofcom as private networks, postings here are likely to concentrate on the regulation of those networks. Postings here are, to the best of our knowledge, accurate on the date they are made, but may well become out of date or unreliable at unpredictable times thereafter. Before taking action that may have legal consequences, you should talk to your own lawyers. NEW: To help navigate the many posts on the General Data Protection Regulation, I've classified them as most relevant to developing a GDPR compliance process, GDPR's effect on specific topics, or how the GDPR is being developed. Or you can just use my free GDPR project plan.

Group administrators:

DEB - New Amendment Demands the Impossible

Wednesday, June 6, 2012 - 09:55

Even worse news on the Digital Economy Bill, I'm afraid. A successful amendment (amendment 120A) to the Bill last night has given courts the power to order ISPs to block access to any website where a "substantial proportion of the content" infringes copyright.

In his blog, Lord Clement-Jones, who proposed the amendment, quotes the Internet Watch Foundation's list of indecent images of children as a precedent for this. Apparently he has failed to notice the IWF's own FAQ on blocking, which states:

Blocking is designed to protect people from inadvertent access to ... images ... No known technology is capable of effectively denying [those] who are actively seeking such material

and

We consider blocking to be a short-term disruption tactic which can help protect internet users from stumbling across these images.

In the case of copyright infringing material it seems that far more people are "actively seeking" it than are "stumbling across" it. So while the recognition that the courts are the right place to resolve questions of copyright infringement is welcome, the power given them by the amendment is to order ISPs to do something that is known to be impossible.

What's worse is that blocking material that people want to access will encourage them to use methods to get around those blocks (which can be simple and do not require technical knowledge). And once someone starts using those techniques, they are also exposed to all the viruses, trojans and other harmful things on the Internet that we work so hard to protect them from.

UPDATES

The amendment is getting a lot of comment, almost all of it critical: